Our methodology
How we research and build guides
Each guide begins with a specific homeowner question, then identifies the constraints and verification work behind the decision.
A decision-first research process
The goal is to help readers understand the decision, identify constraints, and know what to verify before choosing or ordering a product.
1. Start with reviewed source material
We use sanitized planning records, selection schedules, reviewed plan excerpts, and original design concepts when they add useful context. Private identifying information and material without clear publication rights are excluded.
2. Separate historical examples from current guidance
A product specified in an earlier project may have changed, been discontinued, or gained a replacement model. We distinguish what was specified in the original project, what has been verified as current, what still requires confirmation, and what is shown only as a design concept.
3. Verify product facts
Before presenting product information as current, we check details such as model number, dimensions, finish, compatibility, whether the exact model is still current, and availability. Official manufacturer documentation is the preferred source for technical product claims. Verification dates are included when timing could affect the decision.
4. Check compatibility in context
A matching finish or brand name does not prove that components work together. Compatibility guidance considers model families, valves, cartridges, installation requirements, accessories, dimensions, and other relevant constraints.
5. Use authoritative sources for technical topics
Plumbing, electrical, ventilation, steam, accessibility, blocking, structural, installation, and code-related guidance is checked against current manufacturer, agency, or code sources when applicable. We state jurisdiction and date limits where they matter.
Where a professional is needed: Project-specific safety, installation, and code decisions belong with appropriately licensed professionals. Our guides are planning resources, not engineering documents, installation approvals, or substitutes for professional judgment.
6. Label visuals accurately
Original plans and visuals are reviewed for privacy and publication rights before use. Concepts are not described as completed rooms. Material AI polishing is disclosed when used.
7. Review and correct
Pages may be updated as products, documentation, or standards change. Material corrections are made when an error could change a reader’s decision.
See the framework in practice
The Fixtures and Finishes Planning Hub applies this process to connected room decisions.